Skip to main content
Blog Header Image

Dr. Jamie Phillips PT, DPT, MS, CSCS

   •    

September 14, 2025

Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) in Hockey Players: Causes, Symptoms, Prevention, and Treatment

What Is FAI? (Brief Hip Anatomy & Impingement)

Definition: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) occurs when abnormal bone shape in the hip causes the femoral head (ball) and acetabulum (socket) to rub, creating painful pinching and joint irritation.

Cam vs. Pincer:

  • Cam: Extra bone on the femoral head/neck grinds cartilage inside the socket.
  • Pincer: Overcoverage of the socket rim pinches the labrum between bones.
  • Combined: Many athletes have features of both.
  • Joint Damage: Repeated impingement can tear the labrum and wear cartilage, accelerating osteoarthritis if not addressed.

Why Hockey Players Are Susceptible

Skating Mechanics: Deep hip flexion with internal rotation (crossovers, stride, goalie butterfly) increases contact between the femoral neck and socket edge.

High Cam Prevalence: Studies report very high cam-type morphology in elite hockey players, including NHL populations.

Youth Training Load: Year-round skating during skeletal development may stimulate cam formation (bone adapts to load).

Not Always Symptomatic: Many athletes show cam/pincer morphology without pain; FAI becomes problematic when it drives labral or cartilage injury.

(At Ghost Rehab & Performance in Grand Rapids/Byron Center, MI, we routinely assess hockey players for these risk factors and tailor prevention plans to their schedule and position.)

Common Symptoms and Warning Signs

  • Groin or front-of-hip pain provoked by skating, pivots, deep squats, or prolonged sitting.
  • Stiffness and limited motion, especially flexion and internal rotation; difficulty maintaining low stances.
  • Clicking, catching, or locking, often with labral involvement.
  • Pain with prolonged sitting or post-game flare-ups.
  • Limping or stride changes; toe-out walking to avoid painful ranges.
  • “C-sign” pain description: hand cupping deep hip joint.

Risks of Leaving FAI Untreated

  • Labral tears with instability and painful catching.
  • Cartilage wear and early osteoarthritis.
  • Chronic pain and loss of function in sport and daily life.
  • Reduced performance (power, ROM, acceleration, agility).
  • Compensatory injuries to the opposite hip, knees, or low back.

Prevention Strategies for Hockey

  • Thorough dynamic warm-ups (aerobic ramp + hip-focused mobility).
  • Hip mobility (rock-backs, deep lunge, figure-4, adductor mobility; banded hip distraction as tolerated).
  • Strengthen support (glutes, hamstrings, core) to optimize pelvic control and hip mechanics; train pain-free ranges.
  • Avoid overuse/early specialization in youth; encourage seasons off, multi-sport participation, and load monitoring.
  • Technique coaching to minimize excessive, repetitive extremes.
  • Address symptoms early; modify drills and strength work if groin/hip pain emerges.
  • Off-ice posture hygiene (break up sitting, hip flexor relief, core/posterior-chain balance).

(Our team in West Michigan integrates warm-up templates, mobility circuits, and strength progressions into team and individual programs for hockey athletes.)

How FAI Is Diagnosed

  • Clinical evaluation: History, FADIR/FABER tests, ROM, gait/stride observations.
  • Imaging:
    • X-ray (alpha angle >~55° suggests cam; look for pincer signs and arthritis).
    • MRI/MRA to assess labrum and cartilage; CT for pre-op 3D planning when needed.
  • Diagnostic injection: Image-guided intra-articular anesthetic (± corticosteroid) can confirm intra-articular pain sources.

Treatment Options

Conservative (Non-Surgical)

  • Activity modification & rest from provocative ranges; smart in-season adjustments.
  • Physical therapy: Restore ROM, strengthen glutes/core/rotators, improve mechanics (hip hinge, stride), reduce front-hip overload.
  • NSAIDs for short-term symptom relief as medically appropriate.
  • Injections: Corticosteroid for temporary relief/diagnosis; sparingly used in young athletes.
  • Ongoing management: Maintain mobility/strength routine, progressive load, symptom monitoring.

Surgical

  • When to consider: Persistent pain despite rehab or imaging-confirmed structural injury limiting function.
  • Hip arthroscopy: Cam/pincer resection, labral repair/debridement, chondroplasty; typically outpatient.
  • Outcomes: High return-to-play rates in elite hockey; earlier intervention before advanced cartilage loss yields better results.

Returning to Play

  • Commit to rehab: Phase-based restoration of ROM → strength → neuromuscular control → skating-specific progressions.
  • Gradual on-ice progression: Non-contact skill → intensity/changes of direction → controlled contact → full play.
  • Criteria-based clearance: Symmetry of ROM, ≥90% strength, sport-specific tasks at speed without pain (e.g., Vail Hip Sports Test).
  • Typical timelines: Weeks–months for conservative care; ~4–8 months post-arthroscopy (individualized).
  • Psychological readiness and post-return maintenance (mobility/strength “keepers,” periodic check-ins).
  • Smart adjustments (e.g., goalie butterfly volume, off-ice workload) support longevity.

Key Takeaway

FAI is common in hockey due to sport-specific loads, but with education, early recognition, and a structured plan, athletes can prevent escalation, treat symptoms effectively, and return to high-level play. Addressing issues early protects careers and long-term hip health.

(If you’re in Grand Rapids or the greater West Michigan area and suspect FAI, Ghost Rehab & Performance in Byron Center provides evaluation, imaging coordination, and hockey-specific rehab to keep you on the ice.)

References

  • Powers CM, et al. (2020). Rehabilitation strategies for FAI and post-arthroscopy patients. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 50(3), 123–135.
  • Ayeni OR, et al. (2012). Femoroacetabular impingement in elite ice hockey players. J Bone & Joint Surg, 94(10), e58.
  • Agricola R, et al. (2013). Development of Cam-type deformity in adolescent and young male soccer players: a prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med, 42(4), 798–806.
  • Philippon MJ, et al. (2014). The prevalence of cam-type deformity in high-level youth hockey players. Am J Sports Med, 41(6), 1357–1361.
  • Siebenrock KA, et al. (2011). The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469(11), 3229–3240.
  • Larson CM, et al. (2013). Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate and professional ice hockey players. Am J Sports Med, 41(1), 134–138.
  • Economopoulos KJ, et al. (2015). The effect of skating posture on hip joint loading during on-ice skating in hockey players. Clin Biomech, 30(6), 589–594.
  • Clohisy JC, et al. (2008). A systematic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of FAI. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 16(9), 561–570.
  • Ganz R, et al. (2003). Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 417, 112–120.
  • Beck M, et al. (2005). The anatomy and function of the labrum in the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 429, 16–23.
  • Byrd JWT. (2005). Hip arthroscopy in athletes. Oper Tech Sports Med, 13(2), 78–88.
  • Kuhns BD, et al. (2015). Outcomes after hip arthroscopy in elite athletes: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med, 43(1), 1–8.
  • Domb BG, et al. (2014). Return to sport after hip arthroscopy in elite athletes. Am J Sports Med, 42(1), 180–185.
  • Kivlan BR, et al. (2011). Relationship between lower extremity mechanics and patient-reported outcomes in athletes with FAI. J Sport Rehabil, 20(4), 457–471.
  • Menge TJ, et al. (2017). Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in competitive hockey players: return to sport and performance metrics. Orthop J Sports Med, 5(2), 2325967116689490.
  • Agricola R, et al. (2014). Cam impingement and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am, 44(4), 449–461.
  • Kelly BT, et al. (2005). Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of literature. Arthroscopy, 21(12), 1496–1504.
  • Takla A, et al. (2020). Physical examination and imaging of the hip in athletes. Clin Sports Med, 39(2), 163–179.
  • Khan M, et al. (2016). Predictors of outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Sports Health, 8(2), 141–148.
  • Nepple JJ, et al. (2013). The hip fluid seal—Part I: the role of labral and cartilaginous structures in hip stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(4), 1138–1143.
  • Reiman MP, et al. (2015). Femoroacetabular impingement surgery, rehabilitation, and return to sport: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 10(4), 547–565.
  • Scott EJ, et al. (2021). Return to sport after femoroacetabular impingement surgery in high-level athletes: a comprehensive review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil, 3(2), e423–e430.
  • Casartelli NC, et al. (2015). The hip sports activity scale: development and validation. Am J Sports Med, 43(4), 826–832.
  • LaPrade RF, et al. (2020). A sports physical therapy approach to FAI and hip arthroscopy. Sports Health, 12(2), 122–130.
  • Menge TJ, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. (2017). Survival and performance of professional athletes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med, 45(6), 1442–1448.
  • Larson CM, et al. (2010). Functional testing in FAI: the Vail Hip Sports Test. Orthop J Sports Med, 2(1), 11–17.
  • Fabricant PD, et al. (2015). Early outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI in athletes under 18 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop, 35(2), 123–129.
  • Feeley BT, et al. (2016). Return to elite-level play after hip arthroscopy among NHL players. Orthop J Sports Med, 4(3), 2325967116632752.
  • Sampson TG. (2005). Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 441, 222–229.
  • Philippon MJ, et al. (2007). Arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of FAI: minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthopedics, 30(8), 647–652.
  • Krych AJ, et al. (2013). Diagnostic hip injections: efficacy, accuracy, and indications. Clin Sports Med, 32(3), 411–419.
  • Tijssen M, et al. (2016). Conservative treatment of FAI: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med, 50(19), 1219–1226.
  • de Sa D, et al. (2015). Hip arthroscopy for FAI: a review of clinical outcomes and return to sport. Sports Health, 7(3), 268–272.
  • Notzli HP, et al. (2002). MRI of the femoral head-neck junction in FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 418, 67–73.
  • Byrd JWT, Jones KS. (2011). Hip arthroscopy in athletes: 10-year outcomes. Am J Sports Med, 39(1), 117–123.
  • O’Donnell J, et al. (2021). Femoroacetabular impingement: current concepts and controversies. J ISAKOS, 6(4), 172–180.
  • Sansone M, et al. (2016). Predictors of outcome after hip arthroscopy in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24(10), 3356–3362.
  • Ayeni OR, et al. (2014). Femoroacetabular impingement in young athletes: a review. Clin J Sport Med, 24(6), 464–470.

Continue reading